To Err Is Human. But Robot Referees?
As sporting stakes are continually raised, so is the cost of refereeing error. The English Premier League will not see Rob Styles officiating next weekend, after his blunders effectively cost Liverpool their game against Chelsea on Saturday. Referee Styles awarded a dubious penalty and a yellow card mix up.
Not that Liverpool have much to complain about. The team scored a "phantom" goal against Chelsea in the semi-finals of the Champion's League two years ago, putting the celery-lovers out of the tournament. "Did the ball actually cross the line?" is a question that goes all the way back, doubtless, to the first game ever played. And after being found wanting with his response to that question in the Middlesborough v. Fulham game on Saturday, assistant referee Ian Gosling also finds himself benched.
It's all grist to the mill of the technology vendors of course. You remember: the ones who want to put radio chips in the balls to track them into the goal. Hawkeye, the camera-based system that has revolutionized tennis and especially cricket coverage is now, invevitably, being touted as a panacea. £250,000 per ground to install, if you please.
Technology can be great, especially when it enhances competition broadcasts. But demonstrate a lack of confidence in referees at the top of the game and you condemn the officiating of every game refereed by humans to to be dogged by questions of competence. Not to mention depriving Premier League fans and sportswriters alike the chance to examine and mourn the one that got away. Stick with the humans.





